Free: 15-question metabolic assessment — reviewed by the HealthCalculus medical panel. Start now

Free · Contested evidence, stated plainly

Seed oil spotter

Estimate how much industrial seed oil actually passes through your week — then paste any ingredient list and watch the named oils light up. We do not claim they are toxic. We do think you should know where yours comes from.

15

Oils flagged

6

Exposure channels

$0

And no email

01Your exposure

Most people are wrong about where theirs comes from

They change the bottle in the kitchen and eat out four times a week. The panel asks six questions, weights the six channels that carry most of the volume, and tells you which one is actually doing the work.

Evidence quality: contested

We publish both sides of this one below, including the studies that undercut the cautious position. If a site only shows you one side of the seed-oil argument, it is selling something.

Seed Oil Exposure

Question 1 of 6

Before anything else: this literature is genuinely contested, and the result will say so. What I can do is estimate how much industrial seed oil actually passes through your week — because most people are wrong about where theirs comes from.

Label scanner

Paste any ingredient list

Runs entirely in your browser — nothing is uploaded. We flag the named industrial seed oils. We do not flag palm oil as uniformly harmful: refined palm is often blended with seed oils, but unrefined palm fruit oil has a different fatty-acid profile. Coconut oil is a fruit oil, not a seed oil, and is not flagged.

02The label scanner

Paste a label. Watch it light up.

Fifteen named industrial oils, plus the generic terms that hide them — “vegetable oil” is almost always a soy or canola blend, and hydrogenated anything is its own conversation.

Named oilsCanola, rapeseed, soybean, corn, cottonseed
Also namedSunflower, safflower, grapeseed, rice bran
Generic termsVegetable oil, vegetable shortening
Flagged as a hintPalm oil, hydrogenated oils
Not flaggedCoconut oil, butter, ghee, olive oil

Everything runs in your browser. Nothing you paste is uploaded, logged or associated with you.

03Both sides

We will not pretend this is settled

Two reasonable positions exist, held by serious people, on evidence that genuinely points both ways. Here is each one at its strongest, with the papers attached.

The cautious case

Ramsden, DiNicolantonio

Recovered data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study and the Minnesota Coronary Experiment showed that swapping saturated fat for linoleic-rich seed oil did not reduce mortality, and in the Minnesota reanalysis was associated with higher mortality in some subgroups. The proposed mechanism is oxidised linoleic-acid metabolites, and linoleic intake has risen substantially over the last century.

The mainstream case

Cochrane, AHA

The Hooper Cochrane review finds that reducing saturated fat lowers cardiovascular events when the replacement is polyunsaturated. Chowdhury 2014 found no clean signal for saturated fat either, and Astrup 2020 argues the food matrix matters more than the isolated fatty acid — a view gaining ground without overturning the replacement position.

Where we land

We do not take the “seed oils are toxic” position, because the evidence does not support that strength of claim. We do take a precautionary one: where a reasonable alternative exists — olive oil, butter, ghee, tallow, avocado oil — prefer it. Where it does not, such as eating out, accept the exposure rather than build a life around avoiding it.

Sources — both sides

01

Use of dietary linoleic acid for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and death: evaluation of recovered data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study

Ramsden CE et al. · BMJ · 2013 · contested evidence

PubMed 23386268
02

Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)

Ramsden CE et al. · BMJ · 2016 · contested evidence

PubMed 27071971
03

Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease (Cochrane systematic review)

Hooper L et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · moderate evidence

PubMed 32428300
04

Omega-6 vegetable oils as a driver of coronary heart disease: the oxidized linoleic acid hypothesis

DiNicolantonio JJ, O'Keefe JH · Open Heart · 2018 · contested evidence

PubMed 30364556
05

Saturated Fats and Health: A Reassessment and Proposal for Food-Based Recommendations

Astrup A et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020 · contested evidence

PubMed 32562735
06

Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chowdhury R et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2014 · contested evidence

PubMed 24723079
04Where it lives

Ranked by how much volume each channel carries

Bar length is our weighting for a typical North American adult, not a measured quantity. The order is what matters.

Restaurant and takeaway cooking

Rank 1

Most North American kitchens fry, sauté and dress in canola or soybean oil. Even the salad arrives with it. For adults who eat out several times a week, this single channel usually outweighs every other one combined.

Packaged snacks and ultra-processed food

Rank 2

Crackers, crisps, biscuits, granola bars — seed oils are the default fat because they are cheap and shelf-stable. This channel overlaps almost entirely with your UPF score.

Mayo, dressings and sauces

Rank 3

Standard bottled dressing is close to pure soybean oil by volume. This is the easiest channel to change because it is one purchase, not a habit.

Fried food

Rank 4

Chips, fries, anything breaded. Repeatedly heated oil also carries the oxidation argument that the cautious case rests on, which makes this the channel both sides are least comfortable with.

The health aisle

Rank 5

Granola, protein bars, plant-based meat alternatives, roasted nuts. Marketing and ingredient list rarely agree. Worth scanning rather than assuming.

The replacement list

What to use instead

Cooking at homeButter, ghee, olive oil, tallow, lard, coconut oil, avocado oil
Salad dressingOlive oil and vinegar, or an avocado-oil brand
MayoAvocado-oil mayo, or homemade
SnacksWhole nuts rather than roasted, cheese, eggs, fruit
RestaurantsGrilled protein and vegetables — then let it go
05Questions

Straight answers

About seed oils

Honestly: nobody can tell you that with confidence yet, and anyone who does is overselling their side. The cautious case rests on recovered data from two old randomised trials — the Sydney Diet Heart Study and the Minnesota Coronary Experiment — where replacing saturated fat with linoleic-rich seed oil did not reduce mortality and in one analysis appeared to increase it.

The mainstream case rests on Cochrane and AHA syntheses finding that replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat reduces cardiovascular events. Both bodies of evidence are real. We take a precautionary position rather than a certain one: prefer traditional fats where a reasonable alternative exists, and accept the exposure where it doesn't.

The cautious case

  • Ramsden 2013 — recovered Sydney Diet Heart data
  • Ramsden 2016 — recovered Minnesota Coronary Experiment
  • Oxidised linoleic-acid metabolites as the proposed mechanism
  • Linoleic acid intake has risen sharply in a century

The mainstream case

  • Hooper 2020 Cochrane — replacing saturated fat cuts CV events
  • AHA advisory maintains the replacement position
  • Chowdhury 2014 — no clean saturated-fat signal either
  • Astrup 2020 — food matrix may matter more than the fat itself

Educational only. The seed-oils literature is contested and we present both sides rather than picking one for you.

Fat quality is one variable. Find the one that matters for you.

The assessment looks at insulin markers, sleep, training and what you have already tried — and points you at the protocol the research supports for your profile.

Educational only, not medical advice. This page produces an estimate of dietary exposure, not a diagnosis, and the underlying evidence is contested. Consult your physician before major dietary changes or altering prescribed medication, particularly if you are managing cardiovascular risk. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Individual results vary; no outcome is guaranteed.